Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42248942›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Efficiency of indirect selection in sorghum breeding for target production environments in moisture deficit areas of Ethiopia.

Teklay Abebe Teferi, Taye T Mindaye, Gemechu Keneni, Gurja Belay, Amare Seyoum, Tokuma Legesse, Gebreslassie Gebru Berhe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teklay Abebe Teferi *Tigray Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), P.O. Box 492, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia. teklayabebe6@gmail.com.
Taye T MindayeEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P. O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gemechu KeneniEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P. O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gurja BelayDepartment of Microbial Sciences and Genetics, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Adiss Ababa University, P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Amare SeyoumEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P. O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tokuma LegesseEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P. O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gebreslassie Gebru Berhe *Tigray Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), P.O. Box 492, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia. gebre192@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of crop breeding program ultimately hinges on developing, disseminating, and integrating suitable varieties into the production system. A critical challenge in variety development process is whether indirect selection in one environment is more effective than direct selection in the target environment. Hence, the efficiency of direct vis-à-vis indirect selection was compared, and recommendations are provided to support more objective breeding strategies. Thirty-six series of variety trials conducted between 1994 and 2020 at the pre-national and national levels, and evaluated under selection and target environments were used for analysis. Grain yield, heritability, predicted genetic gain, and genetic correlations varied significantly across environments. The mean yield was 3565.6 kg ha

Indexed as

Plant BreedingSelection, GeneticSorghumDroughtsEdible GrainEnvironmentEthiopiaGene-Environment InteractionBroad-sense heritabilityDirect selectionGenetic correlationIndirect selectionPredicted genetic gainSelection environmentTarget environment

Identifiers

PMID42248942
PMCPMC13483951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.