ArticleScientific reports2026
Federated autoencoder-based clinical decision framework with hybrid class balancing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite diagnosis accuracy has been much improved by depending more on deep learning for disease classification, it raises serious concerns about patient data privacy, security, and scalability. Conventional centralized deep learning approaches are vulnerable to data leaks and non-compliance with such privacy rules as GDPR and HIPAA since they rely on the aggregation of sensitive medical records. Our work presents a privacy-preserving federated learning architecture enabling cooperative model training among many healthcare institutions without exposing raw patient data, hence addressing these issues. Combining autoencoder-driven hierarchical feature extraction, the proposed method improves classification performance and guarantees low information loss. Moreover applied is a hybrid class-balancing mechanism integrating generative augmentation techniques with Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMote) to eliminate bias in unbalanced illness datasets, so raising sensitivity for minority-class scenarios. Maintaining computational efficiency in federated systems, experimental evaluation demonstrates that the proposed model achieves accuracy of 92.5% outperforming both classic CNN-based (87.2%) and LSTM-based (89.1%) models. Strong convergence even in non-IID distributed medical data is promised by adaptive federated averaging. Furthermore, the proposed method resists adversarial attacks, therefore enhancing the security in the surrounding practical areas. This work decreases the distance between high-accurate disease categorization and privacy-preserving artificial intelligence by offering the basis for scalable, distributed, secure medical intelligence systems. The findings help federated medical artificial intelligence to grow by proving its ability to change healthcare diagnostics while keeping regulatory compliance and data security.In this study, the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) is incorporated to address the class imbalance present in the distributed medical datasets. SMOTE generates new synthetic samples for minority classes by interpolating between existing minority instances, thereby preventing model bias toward majority classes and improving classification robustness across federated clients. By enhancing minority-class representation prior to federated aggregation, SMOTE ensures that the global model learns more discriminative and balanced feature patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.