Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42248930›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modeling anisotropic preference manifolds for robust graph-based fashion recommendation.

Xiao Zhang, Tien-Ping Tan, Haiping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao ZhangHangzhou Dianzi University Information Engineering School, 311305, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Tien-Ping TanUniversiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. tienping@usm.my.
Haiping ZhangHangzhou Dianzi University Information Engineering School, 311305, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph Convolutional Networks (GNNs) have become a dominant paradigm for collaborative filtering; however, their efficacy in complex domains like fashion is often hindered by a fundamental geometric mismatch between model assumptions and data reality. Conventional methods typically rely on scalar aggregation and Euclidean metrics, which implicitly assume that user interest clusters are isotropic (spherical) and uniformly dense. This assumption fails to capture the complexity of fashion preferences, where style distributions exhibit significant anisotropic variance-ranging from sparse, broad categories to dense, niche trends. To bridge this gap, we propose the Multi-Interest Mahalanobis Denoising Graph Convolutional Network (MIMD-GCN), a framework that synergizes structural disentanglement with geometry-aware denoising. We introduce a Poly-Attention mechanism to disentangle user representations into multiple latent interest centers, thereby resolving the collapse of diverse preferences into single vectors. Furthermore, we construct an anisotropic denoising module based on a learnable Mahalanobis distance barrier. Unlike static Euclidean thresholds, this mechanism dynamically adapts to the covariance structure of specific interest manifolds, establishing elliptical boundaries that effectively isolate spurious interactions while preserving valid niche signals. Extensive experiments on Amazon-Clothing and Taobao datasets demonstrate that MIMD-GCN consistently improves recommendation performance over strong baselines and exhibits enhanced robustness under synthetic noise. These results suggest that anisotropic modeling provides a beneficial geometric perspective for capturing complex user preferences in fashion recommendation.

Indexed as

Anisotropic DenoisingDisentangled RepresentationFashion RecommendationMahalanobis DistanceMulti-Interest Learning

Identifiers

PMID42248930
PMCPMC13478638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.