Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42248855›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Turing universal neural networks do not require global clocks.

Hava T Siegelmann, Roy N Siegelmann, Stephen Chung, Chloé Becquey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hava T SiegelmannDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. hava@umass.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4938-8723
Roy N SiegelmannDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Stephen ChungDepartment of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Chloé BecqueyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0062-947X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent neural networks were proven to be Turing universal in the 1990s, motivating computational complexity studies of spiking networks, neural Turing machines with differentiable activations, and transformers. At the time, neural networks were exploratory and small, whereas today large-scale deployment makes energy efficiency critical. We thus extend the development of computational foundations of neural networks to asynchronous networks. Asynchrony is modeled by updating a single randomly selected neuron per step, eliminating global updates and reducing energy use. While asynchrony introduces variability in update sequences and thus has often been considered impractical for computing, we introduce design constraints which lead to Turing universal asynchronous architectures. We prove universality both for asynchronous fixed architectures with varying-precision neurons and for variable architectures with fixed-precision neurons. These results advance the theoretical understanding of asynchronous networks, suggesting that they preserve full computational power, remain amenable for efficient training, and may achieve substantial reductions in energy use.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationNerve NetNeuronsRecurrent Neural NetworksSoft Computing

Identifiers

PMID42248855
PMCPMC13396773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.