Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42248809›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2026

Digital Inequality and Internet Self-Efficacy in Adults With Intellectual Disability: Motivational, Demographic and Contextual Predictors of Online Participation.

Sarah Glencross, Jonathan Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah GlencrossUniversity of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7504-9173
Jonathan MasonCairnmillar Institute, Hawthorn East, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-6137

Funding

National Disability Insurance Agency
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults with intellectual disability face multiple barriers to digital participation, yet limited research has examined how motivational and demographic factors interact to influence internet self-efficacy.

methodStructured interviews were conducted with 96 adults with mild or moderate intellectual disability and 49 adults without intellectual disability across urban and regional locations in Australia. Internet self-efficacy, attitudes and behavioural beliefs were assessed using adapted measures informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

resultsParticipants with intellectual disability had significantly lower internet self-efficacy than their peers, particularly those who were older, lived in regional areas or lacked professional support. Motivational variables predicted a small proportion of self-efficacy variance for participants with intellectual disability and a larger proportion for the comparison group.

conclusionsFindings suggest digital inequality among people with intellectual disability is shaped by contextual and motivational factors. Support programmes informed by behavioural theory may help increase digital confidence and online engagement.

Indexed as

Digital MediaIntellectual DisabilityInternetMotivationSelf EfficacyAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42248809
PMCPMC13241320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.