Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42248216›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical biology2026

Viktoriia Nechepurenko, Victoriya Georgiyants, Yuliya Prokopenko, Olha Mykhailenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viktoriia NechepurenkoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Victoriya GeorgiyantsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Yuliya ProkopenkoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Olha MykhailenkoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a structured narrative synthesis of the phytochemical composition, pharmacological properties, and translational relevance of

methodsA structured narrative review was conducted using ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and SpringerLink databases through an iterative literature retrieval and refinement process. Priority was given to recent peer-reviewed English-language journal articles, particularly those published after 2015, with selective inclusion of earlier foundational studies where relevant. Eligible sources included studies reporting phytochemical characterization, mechanistic, experimental, translational, or clinical pharmacological data, as well as investigations addressing post-harvest or post-distillation biomass utilization. Literature was screened and synthesized using a thematic analytical approach.

results

conclusionThe findings establish

Indexed as

BiomassLavandulaOils, VolatilePlant ExtractsPolyphenolsAnimalsHumansOils, VolatilePlant ExtractsPolyphenolsessential oilLavandula angustifoliapharmacologypolyphenolsvalorization

Identifiers

PMID42248216
PMCPMC13244516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.