ArticleHearing research2026
Electrically evoked compound action potentials in adult and pediatric cochlear implant users: II. Assessing cochlear nerve health status with the interphase gap effect and the phase locking value.
Article in Hearing research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study characterized and compared neural synchrony in the cochlear nerve (CN) and the number of CN fibers activated by electrical stimulation. Neural synchrony was quantified using the phase locking value. The number of activated CN fibers was assessed using the effect of increasing the interphase gap (IPG) of biphasic pulses on the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP), referred to as the IPG effect. The study included 50 postlingually deafened adults and 51 pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users with Cochlear™ Nucleus® devices. PLV and IPG effect measures were obtained at four and three electrode locations in adults and pediatric participants, respectively. In adults, CN neural synchrony was significantly poorer at basal compared with more apical electrode locations. No such electrode-location effect was observed in pediatric participants. No electrode-location differences in the IPG effect were observed in either group. Compared with pediatric participants, adults showed significantly poorer CN neural synchrony at the most basal electrode location, but not at the most apical location. No group differences were observed in the IPG effect. No association was found between PLV and the IPG effect at any electrode location in either group. These findings are consistent with differences in CN health status between adult and pediatric CI users and further support the notion that PLV and the IPG effect reflect distinct underlying biological mechanisms rather than non-neural factors. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between age and these eCAP-derived measures in adult CI users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.