ArticleEnvironment international2026
Street view-based exposure to greenspace and mortality: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Article in Environment international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Higher exposure to greenspace has been associated with reduced mortality rates in predominantly White samples. However, the specific contribution of different types of greenspace exposures to these associations and whether the associations vary by race and ethnicity have not been studied. Our main objective was to quantify the association between specific types of greenspaces and all-cause mortality risk among participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We analyzed data from 6,795 MESA participants, with baseline interviews in 2000 and follow-up through 2018. Deep learning algorithms were applied to Street View images to estimate percent of residential greenspace type (e.g., %Trees and %Grass) within a 500 m buffer for each follow-up year. We used Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the association between % of each greenspace metric and mortality, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Among 6,748 individuals (mean baseline age 62 years [SD 10]) totaling 973,608 person-years, we observed 1898 (28.1%) deaths during 19 years of follow-up. In fully-adjusted models, exposure to %Other green (fields, flowers, and plants) was associated with lower mortality (0.89, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.94), while %Grass showed a similar but less consistent inverse association (0.91, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.99). This protective association was particularly notable among participants living in neighborhoods with low socioeconomic status (%Other green 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.97). No associations were observed for %Trees. Our results suggest that greater exposure to certain greenspace types may be associated with a reduced mortality risk among MESA participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.