Observational studyThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Plasma brain-derived p-Tau217 outperforms other p-Tau species in detecting abnormal brain amyloid in an Asian cohort of older people with cerebrovascular disease burden.
Observational study in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Excitation-inhibition imbalance links amyloid pathophysiology to cognition in non-demented individuals.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Decreased Plasma IGF-1 Is Associated with Cortical Atrophy, but Not Concomitant Cerebrovascular Disease in Alzheimer's Dementia.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of plasma brain-derived pTau.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- CNS-selective plasma p-tau217 accurately captures Alzheimer's disease pathology and progression.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasma brain derived-p-Tau217 (BD-p-Tau217) may outperform total-p-Tau217 in detecting brain amyloid burden and warrants evaluation.
objectivesTo perform head-to-head comparison of plasma BD- as well as total-p-Tau181, p-Tau217 and p-Tau231 for detecting beta-amyloid positivity (Aβ+), evaluate reference ranges for Aβ+, and assess the prognostic utility of BD-p-Tau217 reference ranges.
designObservational study.
settingParticipants recruited from memory clinics and the community in Singapore.
participants213 participants, including 44 cognitively normal, 107 cognitively impaired no dementia, and 62 dementia (mean [SD] age, 73 [1] years; 121 females). MEASUREMENTS: Amyloid status (Aβ- [n = 139] vs Aβ+ [n = 74]) was determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Plasma BD-p-Tau and total-p-Tau were measured using the NULISAseq™ CNS Disease Panel 120. The diagnostic performance for detecting Aβ+, reference ranges (three-range: 95% specificity/95% sensitivity); binary: maximizing Youden index), and the prognostic performance of p-Tau biomarkers were evaluated.
resultsPlasma BD-p-Tau217 (AUC = 0.965) outperformed other BD- and total-p-Tau species in detecting PET Aβ+ (AUC = 0.823-0.937; all p ≤ 0.008). Using a three-range reference, BD-p-Tau217 achieved positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% and 97%, respectively. Proportion of participants in the intermediate-risk group was 7% (n = 14). Applying a binary reference, BD-p-Tau217 achieved both a specificity and sensitivity of 92%, with PPV and NPV of 86% and 96%, respectively. BD-p-Tau217-derived high-risk group exhibited faster cognitive decline than the low-risk group.
conclusionsRisk stratification for PET Aβ+ based on plasma BD-p-Tau217 suggests superior diagnostic and prognostic utility, warranting further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.