Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247680›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Evaluating an Abbreviated Internet-Delivered Stress Recovery Intervention for Health Care Workers: Pre-Post Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Usability, and Acceptability.

Austeja Dumarkaite, Anton Käll, Ramune Serapine, Evaldas Kazlauskas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austeja DumarkaiteCenter for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-6608-8437
Anton KällCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1579-8791
Ramune SerapineCenter for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0001-1873-6951
Evaldas KazlauskasCenter for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-6220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care workers face numerous occupational stressors that place them at heightened risk for burnout and poor mental health. Internet-delivered interventions have shown promise in reducing stress and related symptoms, yet adherence is often low, and users do not complete programs. Abbreviated interventions may help address engagement barriers such as high workload, limited time, and varying user preferences. There is a need to evaluate brief, accessible formats of internet-delivered programs for this population.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the initial outcomes, usability, and acceptability of a 4-week abbreviated internet-delivered stress recovery intervention for health care workers. Specifically, it evaluated changes in stress recovery, perceived stress, depression and anxiety symptoms, and psychological well-being. The study also sought to understand participants' experiences with the brief format to determine whether it meets their needs.

methodsThis single-arm pre-post study examined a 4-week abbreviated version of the online guided cognitive behavioral therapy-based stress recovery program FOREST among self-enrolled health care workers recruited through professional networks (N=52; mean age 39.31, SD 11.31 years; 49/52, 94.2% women). Outcomes included stress recovery (the Recovery Experience Questionnaire), perceived stress (the Perceived Stress Scale-4), depression and anxiety symptoms (the Patient Health Questionnaire-4), psychological well-being (the World Health Organization Well-being Index), and usability and acceptability ratings.

resultsWe found that after the abbreviated version of the FOREST intervention participants showed moderate improvements in stress recovery (d=0.54, 95% CI 0.25-0.83); reductions in stress (d=-0.43, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.14), anxiety and depression symptoms (d=-0.51, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.22); and increase in psychological well-being (d=0.39, 95% CI 0.08-0.70). The majority (37/52, 71.2%) accessed all 6 modules. Users reported high satisfaction with the abbreviated program.

conclusionsWhile preliminary and limited by the pre-post design, these findings indicate that abbreviated internet-based stress recovery programs are a promising and practical tool for supporting the mental health of health care workers. Future research should examine the long-term effects, compare the abbreviated and standard versions, and explore implementation in routine practice.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyHealth PersonnelInternet-Based InterventionOccupational StressStress, PsychologicalAdultAnxietyDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesabbreviated versionfeasibility studyhealth care workersinternet-delivered interventionstress recovery

Identifiers

PMID42247680
PMCPMC13282598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.