Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247676›Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

The Impact of Sunlight and Artificial Light at Night on Sleep Stages: Evidence From a 7-Day Sensor-Based Observational Study.

Andrea Montanari, Li Min Wang, Amit Birenboim, Basile Chaix

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea MontanariSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1774-1676
Li Min WangDepartment of Geography, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-4131
Amit BirenboimDepartment of Geography, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7087-9634
Basile ChaixSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-8630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to circadian entrainers, such as sunlight, positively impacts sleep architecture, while exposure before bedtime to circadian disruptors, such as artificial light and smartphone use, can negatively affect sleep. However, real-world evidence from longitudinal observational studies that simultaneously capture these factors alongside electroencephalography-derived sleep stages remains limited.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of specific environmental and behavioral factors on sleep metrics and architecture by using sensor-based measurements over 7 consecutive days. Specifically, it examined day-to-day associations between (1) daytime sunlight exposure and (2) prebedtime artificial light exposure and smartphone use with selected sleep outcomes on the following night.

methodsA total of 21 participants from the Jerusalem metropolitan area were monitored continuously using the Dreem wearable electroencephalography for sleep staging, HOBO data loggers for light exposure, the wGT3X+ triaxial accelerometer for physical activity, and a dedicated mobile app to record smartphone usage. Sleep outcomes included total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), and the proportions of light sleep (N1) and deep sleep (N3). Sunlight exposure was defined as the number of hours above 1000 lux during daytime, and artificial light and smartphone use before bedtime were quantified as the duration of exposure accumulated in the 2 hours preceding sleep onset. Linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept at the individual level estimated the associations between these exposures and next-night sleep outcomes, adjusting for step count and other individual covariates.

resultsThe average TST was 420 (SD 85) minutes, and SOL averaged 17.6 (SD 18) minutes. Light sleep (N1) represented 6.6% (SD 2.1%) of sleep, and deep sleep (N3) accounted for 20.1% (SD 7.6%). Each additional hour of daytime sunlight exposure was associated with an increase of 10.67 (95% CI 0.6-20.7) minutes in TST the following night and with a 0.3 (95% CI -0.6 to -0.0) percentage-point decrease in light sleep (N1) percentage. No associations were found between evening artificial light exposure and sleep outcomes, while each minute of smartphone use before bedtime was linked to an increase in SOL of 0.2 (95% CI 0.0-0.4) minutes.

conclusionsThese findings emphasize the importance of daylight exposure for circadian alignment and the potential sleep-disruptive effects of evening digital engagement. This study demonstrates the feasibility and value of integrating wearable electroencephalography and environmental and behavioral sensors in naturalistic settings to uncover behavioral and environmental correlates of sleep architecture.

Indexed as

LightingSleep StagesSunlightAdultCircadian RhythmElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansIsraelMaleSleep DurationSmartphonecircadian rhythmelectroencephalogramlight exposuresleepsmartphone usagewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42247676
PMCPMC13282595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.