ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Predicting End-Stage Renal Disease and Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health burden characterized by heterogeneous progression trajectories. Without timely and appropriate management, CKD can lead to increased morbidity and mortality and a reduced quality of life. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk of developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or mortality is essential to facilitate timely intervention and improve patient outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict ESRD and all-cause mortality in patients with CKD. Methods: We developed and validated machine learning models using data from patients with CKD and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, who were treated at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2011 and 2021. Predictors included 69 routinely available demographic, clinical, medication, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables. The outcomes were ESRD and all-cause mortality. The cohort was randomly divided into training (n=23,741, 80%) and testing (n=5936, 20%) sets. The evaluated models included extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, categorical boosting, random forest, and a stacking classifier. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. Supplementary time-to-event analyses were performed using the kidney failure risk equation and survival-based machine learning models. Results: A total of 29,677 patients were included in the study. The median age was 79 (IQR 70.0-88.0) years, and 16,359 (55.1%) were male. Among these patients, 14,993 (50.5%) had hypertension, 7908 (26.6%) had diabetes mellitus, and 1768 (6%) had cancer. During follow-up, 649 patients (2.2%) developed ESRD and 3631 (12.2%) died. The models demonstrated high predictive performance for ESRD, with AUROCs ranging from 0.839 to 0.894. For all-cause mortality, the predictive performance was more modest, with AUROCs ranging from 0.752 to 0.774. Given the low incidence of ESRD in this cohort, model performance was additionally evaluated using precision-recall curves. The area under the precision-recall curve ranged from 0.172 to 0.216 for ESRD prediction and from 0.330 to 0.356 for all-cause mortality across models. Calibration and decision-curve analyses supported model reliability and clinical utility. Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms may serve as useful tools for risk stratification of ESRD and all-cause mortality in patients with CKD, with the potential to support more individualized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.