Voice-Based Structured Nursing Documentation Using Automatic Speech Recognition and Large Language Models: Development and Evaluation Study.

Background: For clinical nurses, manually entering information into hospital information systems (HISs) remains time-consuming and prone to omissions. Although speech recognition can reduce the need for manual entry, its use in clinical settings has historically been limited by code-switching, medical terminology, and noisy ward environments. Recent advances in customized automatic speech recognition (ASR) and large language models (LLMs) now make speech-based, structured documentation aligned with nursing frameworks such as DART (data, action, response, and teaching) increasingly feasible. Objective: This study developed and evaluated an integrated ASR and LLM system that transforms spoken nursing input into structured DART notes and evaluated its accuracy, usability, and clinical feasibility within HIS workflows. Methods: A code-switching nursing speech corpus from emergency and ward settings was used to fine-tune the Whisper large-v2 model with parameter-efficient adaptation. The LLM generated schema-constrained DART records from ASR transcripts, which were verified by nurses before being uploaded to the corresponding HIS fields. Evaluation included mixed error rate for ASR accuracy, F1-scores, and agreement statistics for DART classification, hallucination assessments based on factual correctness, and analysis of nurse feedback on system use. Results: The fine-tuned ASR model reduced the mixed error rate from 44.79% to 6.67%. DART generation achieved a macroaveraged F1-score of 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84) and met the noninferiority margin relative to human transcripts (δ=-0.04). The hallucination rate was 2.51%. During deployment, the monthly volume of valid nursing notes generated through voluntary use of the ASR system increased from 32,724 to 65,417, where each note represented a single documentation entry generated per patient care episode. Among 120 participating nurses, 91 (75.8%) reported reduced workload and improved completeness. Conclusions: The integrated ASR and LLM system was feasible and showed strong performance, with good acceptance among clinical nurses. It reduced the manual documentation burden, improved record completeness, and demonstrated the value of an ASR- and LLM-supported workflow for nursing documentation.