ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Preferences for Telehealth Physical Activity Participation Among a Cohort of Children and Youth With Disabling Conditions: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Children with disabling conditions encounter numerous challenges in participating in physical activity within their community. Telehealth has emerged as an ideal method for promoting physical health and wellness, but there is a need to identify optimal implementation strategies. Objective: This study aimed to describe the telehealth physical activity preferences of active children and youth with disabling conditions to rapidly inform the development of a pilot telehealth program that could be delivered nationally. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a convenience sample of pediatric members of a community-based wellness program. Questions probed preferences for delivery method; programming frequency, intensity, duration, and type; desired outcomes; technology access and proficiency; and additional needed supports. Of the initial 56 respondents, 4 (7.1%) over the age of 18 years were excluded, leaving 52 (92.9%) for analysis. Outcomes were summarized descriptively. Results: Of 392 wellness program members, 56 (14.3%) responses were gathered. The mean age of the 52 analyzed respondents was 10 (SD 3; range 5-16) years. The sample predominantly comprised male (32/52, 61.5%) and White (34/52, 65.4%) individuals, with autism spectrum disorder and developmental disorder as the most common disability types (22/52, 42.3% each). Social and psychological barriers were the most frequently reported challenges to physical activity participation (36/52, 69.2% and 27/52, 51.9%, respectively). Most respondents reported an ideal exercise dose of 1 to 2 sessions per week of 30 to 45 minutes at a novice or beginner difficulty level. Winter was the preferred season for participation. The 2 most desired delivery formats were live videoconferencing and prerecorded videos. Desired program outcomes included strength improvement, mental health, developing new hobbies and activities, and social connection. Over 90% of respondents (47/52, 90.4%) reported having adequate technology at home to support virtual participation. Conclusions: Optimal telehealth programs for this cohort should be brief and low intensity and offered seasonally, with both live and prerecorded delivery options. Although this preferred dose does not meet US physical activity guidelines, it may represent an appropriate starting point for many inactive children with disabilities. Future research should examine behavior change strategies that motivate children to enroll in these programs and support gradual increases in physical activity over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.