Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247441›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Biochemical and molecular insights into anthracnose resistance in chilli.

Manisha Mangal, Jameel Akhtar, Arpita Srivastava, Pardeep Kumar, Sushma Sagar, Theivanai Murugan, Purva Khandelwal, Shilpi Kumari, Vinod Kumar Sharma, Jai Chand Rana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manisha MangalDivision of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Jameel AkhtarDivision of Plant Quarantine, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Arpita SrivastavaDivision of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Pardeep KumarDivision of Plant Quarantine, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
Sushma SagarDivision of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Theivanai MuruganDivision of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Purva KhandelwalDivision of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Shilpi KumariDivision of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Vinod Kumar SharmaDivision of Germplasm Evaluation, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-3119
Jai Chand RanaThe Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is a globally important vegetable crop valued for its nutritional, economic, and culinary significance, yet its productivity is severely threatened by the fruit-rot/anthracnose disease complex caused by Colletotrichum spp. (C. capsici, C. gloeosporioides, and C. acutatum). This study investigated the biochemical and molecular defense responses of two resistant genotypes, CH-281 (EC777200), resistant to C. capsici, and CH-319 (IC119695), resistant to C. gloeosporioides, in comparison with Kashi Anmol, which is susceptible to both pathogens. Resistant genotypes showed smaller lesion diameters, higher activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPX, POX), and increased phenolic accumulation, indicating effective oxidative stress management and sustained defense. Gene expression analyses revealed early and strong induction of defense-related genes in resistant lines. CH-281 challenged with C. capsici exhibited rapid upregulation of PR1 (996-fold), WRKY33, WRKY40, CaMYB, ACS, AOS, and Defensin-like proteins, whereas Kashi Anmol displayed delayed and weaker responses with late surges in ACS and AOS. Similarly, against C. gloeosporioides, CH-319 showed early activation of PR1, WRKY33, CaMYB, and Defensin-like proteins, while the susceptible genotype again demonstrated delayed induction with stronger late peaks. Overall, resistant genotypes mounted timely and robust biochemical and transcriptional defenses, in contrast to the susceptible genotype's delayed responses. These findings highlight the molecular basis of anthracnose resistance and identify key defense genes and pathways that can be harnessed for breeding durable resistance in chilli.

Indexed as

CapsicumColletotrichumDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesAntioxidantsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeOxidative StressPlant ProteinsAntioxidantsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42247441
PMCPMC13240900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.