ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Chromatin insulators homie and nhomie can interact with distant copies either together or separately, with distinct outcomes for enhancer-promoter interactions.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatin insulators, a.k.a. boundary elements, separate regions of the chromosome with distinct chromatin characteristics, including distinct histone modifications. This activity affects gene expression by allowing chromatin domains to be stably regulated and maintained. Insulators also block enhancer-promoter interactions and, somewhat paradoxically, facilitate other interactions, particularly when they stitch together distant regions of the chromosome by pairing with specific partners. Here we explore how long-range interactions facilitated by insulator pairing are affected by the presence of two potentially competing partners. Our results show that when two partners are present, they can reduce each other's effects on distant gene expression, suggesting that enhancer-promoter interactions are best facilitated by pairwise insulator interactions. When a distant copy of an eve insulator (homie or nhomie) is present, it can interact with either or both endogenous insulators. But when one endogenous insulator is removed, the remaining one interacts more strongly with the transgenic copy, biasing the induced enhancer-promoter interactions toward those nearest the remaining endogenous insulator. On the other hand, physical interaction data suggest that strictly pairwise interactions are not the rule, suggesting a more complex model involving tripartite interactions. We further show that removing one or both endogenous eve insulators significantly reduces endogenous eve function at a critical early stage of development, and that the eve Polycomb domain expands in both directions when its insulator boundaries are removed, showing that insulators in their native context are required for each of the main functions that have been ascribed to them based on transgene assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.