Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247421›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Large-scale statistical dissection of sequence-derived biochemical features distinguishing soluble and insoluble proteins.

Nguyen Huy Hoang Vu, Bao Long Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nguyen Huy Hoang VuFaculty of Mathematics, Mechanics and Informatics, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU-HUS), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5636-3892
Bao Long NguyenSchool of Economics and Management, Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1156-553X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein solubility critically influences recombinant expression efficiency and downstream biotechnological applications. While deep learning models have improved predictive accuracy, the intrinsic magnitude, redundancy, and interpretability of classical sequence-derived determinants remain insufficiently characterized. We performed a large-scale univariate analysis on a curated dataset of 78,031 proteins (46,450 soluble; 31,581 insoluble). Thirty-six biochemical descriptors were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Effect sizes were quantified using Cliff's [Formula: see text], and discriminative performance was assessed by ROC AUC. Although 34 features remained statistically significant after correction, most exhibited small effect sizes and substantial overlap between classes. The strongest effects were associated with size-related features (sequence length and molecular weight; [Formula: see text]), whereas charge-related descriptors, particularly the proportion of negatively charged residues ([Formula: see text]; AUC = 0.575), showed consistent but modest shifts. Spearman correlation analysis revealed near-complete redundancy among major size-related variables ([Formula: see text] up to 0.998). Applying a redundancy threshold ([Formula: see text]), we derived a parsimonious composite integrating sequence length and negative charge proportion, achieving AUC = 0.624 (MCC = 0.1746). These findings suggest that sequence-level solubility information is consistent with a low-dimensional organization at the level of global sequence-derived descriptors and governed by coordinated weak effects, establishing a transparent statistical baseline for large-scale solubility characterization.

Indexed as

ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinSolubilityProteins

Identifiers

PMID42247421
PMCPMC13240910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.