SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Plant-based therapeutics for leishmaniasis: A systematic review emphasizing human studies and clinical trial evidence.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeishmaniasis is a parasitic disease caused by Leishmania species and transmitted through sand fly bites, affecting some of the most vulnerable populations globally. Current treatments are limited by high toxicity, poor tolerability, and resistance. Plant-based therapies offer a promising alternative, but human evidence has not been comprehensively reviewed. This review summarizes current evidence on the efficacy and safety of plant-based treatments for leishmaniasis in humans. METHODOLOGY/
findingsWe conducted a systematic review including studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of plant-based treatments for leishmaniasis in humans. This review was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024567764). We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to May 28, 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We summarized the main study results qualitatively and quantitatively (where possible) by estimating risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for treatment outcomes using the meta package in R. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, nine from Iran and one from Sudan, all focused on cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Most used topical creams derived from medicinal plants, either alone or with conventional treatments. In studies combining herbal and standard treatments, four of six studies showed better outcomes in the intervention group. In studies using only the plant-based treatments compared to a standard treatment group, two of four showed better outcomes in the intervention group. Quantitative analysis of eight studies indicated significant healing improvements in the intervention group in three studies, specifically those using Juniperus excelsa, Nigella sativa, and poly-herbal formulations consisting of the pure extract mixture of Althaea (A.) rosa, A. officinalis, and members of the families Leguminosae, Faliaceae, Malvaceae, and Lythraceae (named Z-HE). Mild side effects such as itching and burning were reported with some herbal treatments, while conventional therapies caused more severe reactions in some cases. The risk of bias was mostly high in the studies.
conclusionsThis review highlights the potential of certain plant-based compounds as adjunct or alternative therapies for CL. Despite promising results with Plantago ovata, Juniperus excelsa, and Z-HE poly-herbal extracts, current evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses. Larger, rigorously designed trials with broader representation are needed to confirm efficacy and safety and support policy integration in endemic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.