ArticlePloS one2026
Reliability-based mix design for concrete compressive strength using a physics-prior residual-learning surrogate with calibrated uncertainty.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An integrated framework is presented for concrete compressive strength prediction and reliability-based mix design under data-scarce conditions, in which a physics-prior residual surrogate and uncertainty decomposition are combined. A physics-consistent baseline is constructed from an effective water-to-binder ratio with age effects, time-dependent reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials and the influence of superplasticizer on effective water demand, and is globally calibrated on the training data. A small residual neural network is then superposed on this baseline with explicit regularization, so that remaining nonlinear interactions are learned while the physical scale and monotonicity are preserved. SHAP values and partial dependence curves are used to confirm the dominant positive roles of age and cementitious content, the negative effect of water, and physically plausible nonlinear effects of admixtures and aggregates. The framework is evaluated on a publicly available high-performance concrete strength dataset containing 1,030 mixtures and 8 input variables; the hybrid Physics+Data model attains R2 = 0.9252 and RMSE = 4.39 MPa on an independent test set and maintains similar accuracy when only 40% of the training samples are used. Five-fold cross-validation confirms the stability of these results. Refined uncertainty quantification is carried out by combining mild Monte Carlo dropout, feature and physics-parameter perturbations and a single scaling factor for coverage calibration, yielding nominal 95% prediction intervals with about 95.1% empirical coverage and showing the physics sub-model as the dominant source of variance. On the calibrated surrogate, 28-day reliability-based design maps in the w/b-C plane for a 40 MPa strength target are produced, from which mix recommendations such as [Formula: see text]-0.36 and [Formula: see text]-360 kg/m3 for P ≥ 0.80 are derived.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.