ArticlePloS one2026
Baseline endocrine factors influencing live birth outcomes in Chinese infertile women undergoing their first fresh IVF cycle: A multistate model-based cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome prediction is limited by static, single-endpoint analyses. We aimed to overcome this by using a multistate model to dissect the stage-specific and, crucially, the non-linear influence of endocrine factors across the entire pregnancy continuum in a large-scale cohort. We applied multistate regression models to a large cohort of 12,674 women undergoing their first fresh IVF cycle. This advanced method allowed us to analyze three sequential transitions (from infertility to biochemical pregnancy, from biochemical pregnancy to clinical pregnancy, and ultimately to live birth) and test for non-linear effects of baseline hormones, including anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and antral follicle count (AFC), on the hazard of success at each stage. The principal finding was a significant non-linear relationship between baseline AMH, LH, and AFC and pregnancy success (P < 0.05 for non-linearity). This directly challenges the "higher is better" paradigm, revealing that optimal hormonal "windows", not just maximum levels, are linked to clinical success. The multistate model further distinguished AMH and LH as robust predictors across all stages, while AFC's predictive power was confined to achieving initial pregnancy. The predictive value of baseline hormones in IVF is fundamentally non-linear. Our use of a multistate model demonstrates that while AMH and LH are consistent predictors for the entire pregnancy journey, their clinical interpretation must shift from a linear scale to identifying optimal ranges. This finding provides a more precise scientific basis to personalize ART treatment and improve live birth rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.