SynthesisJournal of behavioral addictions2026
Problematic internet use and borderline personality features: A systematic review informed by the alternative model of personality disorders.
Synthesis in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Associations between problematic internet use (PIU) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) have been reported, but the literature is highly heterogeneous, with some studies assessing overall BPD severity and others examining individual traits (e.g., emotional lability, impulsivity, dissociation). This review synthesizes these approaches using the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD), examining how BPD-relevant pathological personality traits (Criterion B) and impairments in self and interpersonal functioning (Criterion A) relate to PIU. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies examining associations between PIU (e.g., general use, social media, gaming, smartphone use) and personality traits or functioning in adults. Study quality was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Results: Thirty studies (N = 21,358) met inclusion criteria. Emotional lability and impulsivity showed the most consistent associations with PIU across outcome types. Few studies examined impairments in personality functioning, but available evidence suggests that identity disturbance may predict PIU over time and that interpersonal dysfunction is associated with greater use of online environments for reassurance and emotion regulation. Associations involving dissociation and detachment were relatively weak and less consistent. Discussion and Conclusions: Studies varied widely in design, measures, and theoretical approach, limiting direct comparison across studies. Despite this heterogeneity, findings indicate that emotional lability, impulsivity, and identity disturbance appear to represent transdiagnostic vulnerabilities that increase risk for PIU and shape patterns of online engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.