ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Multiracial individuals' perspectives on participating in genetics research.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vast majority of genetics research is confined to a relatively narrow subset of the global population, limiting the benefits of this research. Recommendations to ameliorate this issue frequently include calls to recruit diverse populations through community engagement, an approach that has been effective in genetics, but has not explicitly included Multiracial individuals, despite this being the fastest-growing population in the United States. As such, this study explored Multiracial individuals' perspectives on: (1) what "Multiracial community" means; (2) concerns regarding ancestry-based genetic testing; and (3) preferences for engaging in different stages of translational genetics research. Fourteen adults who self-identified as Multiracial participated in semi-structured interviews. We used deductive coding from study aims and inductive, iterative coding to identify new themes. Participants expressed diverse ideas about what characterizes the Multiracial community, and lacked clarity on definitions. Common concerns about genetics research included the accuracy of genetics research in its application for Multiracial individuals and the limitations of research to capture their diverse backgrounds. Participants preferred to be engaged during research design, recruitment, and result interpretation and communication. Participants suggested recruiting future study participants from younger, urban regions and emphasized that this is a multifaceted heterogeneous group that cannot easily be categorized. We describe the perspectives of Multiracial individuals, who are often excluded from genetics research because their diverse social identities do not fit traditional methods of categorization. This provides a foundation for developing tailored approaches to recruit and engage Multiracial participants in genetics research, ensuring future studies better reflect human diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.