Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247172›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026

Raw EEG as a viable alternative to engineered decompositions in anesthetic depth prediction.

Anika Nagle, Michael E Bryan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anika NagleAndover High School, Andover, Massachusetts, United States of America. nikunagle@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3135-2880
Michael E BryanUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAssessing the depth of anesthesia remains a challenge in operating rooms worldwide, as hospitals often rely on proprietary monitors that are costly and inaccessible to low-resource institutions. This research explores whether machine learning can predict indicators of anesthetic depth from intraoperative EEG, and whether established preprocessing methods significantly improve performance.

methodsUsing EEG recordings from 143 patients receiving sevoflurane, we developed a deep neural framework that integrates convolutional, attention-based, and recurrent components. We hypothesized that empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) of EEG, a signal-processing approach in neurophysiology, would improve prediction of the bispectral index (BIS), a clinical measure of consciousness. Contrary to expectation, models trained on raw EEG achieved similar prediction error to EEMD-based pipelines.

resultsThese findings suggest that EEG signal decomposition may discard important temporal-spectral features that neural architectures can learn directly from raw data. Moreover, the raw-signal pipeline is computationally lighter, making it better suited for real-time deployment on standard hospital hardware.

conclusionThese results challenge assumptions about the role of preprocessing in clinical neurophysiology and point toward more accessible and computationally efficient approaches to anesthesia monitoring.

Indexed as

BISDepth of anesthesiaEEGMachine-learningSignal decomposition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.