ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Raw EEG as a viable alternative to engineered decompositions in anesthetic depth prediction.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAssessing the depth of anesthesia remains a challenge in operating rooms worldwide, as hospitals often rely on proprietary monitors that are costly and inaccessible to low-resource institutions. This research explores whether machine learning can predict indicators of anesthetic depth from intraoperative EEG, and whether established preprocessing methods significantly improve performance.
methodsUsing EEG recordings from 143 patients receiving sevoflurane, we developed a deep neural framework that integrates convolutional, attention-based, and recurrent components. We hypothesized that empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) of EEG, a signal-processing approach in neurophysiology, would improve prediction of the bispectral index (BIS), a clinical measure of consciousness. Contrary to expectation, models trained on raw EEG achieved similar prediction error to EEMD-based pipelines.
resultsThese findings suggest that EEG signal decomposition may discard important temporal-spectral features that neural architectures can learn directly from raw data. Moreover, the raw-signal pipeline is computationally lighter, making it better suited for real-time deployment on standard hospital hardware.
conclusionThese results challenge assumptions about the role of preprocessing in clinical neurophysiology and point toward more accessible and computationally efficient approaches to anesthesia monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42247172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.