ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Stroke literacy in a sample of Italian adults: an iceberg model revealing domain-specific gaps beyond apparent emergency awareness.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDespite public campaigns, pre-hospital delays in acute ischemic stroke remain substantial, with only modest improvement in onset-to-door times.
methodsWe ran a nationwide cross-sectional survey on ischemic stroke knowledge across four domains: conceptual knowledge, symptom recognition, awareness of time-dependent treatment, and intended emergency action (immediate EMS/112 call). A composite score (≥ 3 correct) was analysed using contingency tests and multivariable logistic regression.
resultsAmong 1,769 participants, 71% were female, 60% university-educated, 35% were > 40 years, 9% worked in healthcare, and 47% reported a family history of stroke. Only 25% identified "cerebral stroke" and "cerebral ischemia" as synonyms, and 52% rated stroke as severe but ischemia as milder; accuracy was higher in healthcare workers (45% vs 23%, p < 0.001) and higher education (29% vs 22%, p = 0.002). One quarter failed to identify unilateral paralysis as the cardinal symptom, with lower recognition in those aged ≥ 41 years (70-73% vs ~ 77-79%, p = 0.019). Treatment awareness was high (84%) and associated with higher education/healthcare-related exposure (p = 0.007). Intended EMS/112 call was reported by 85% and associated with younger age (p = 0.004) and indirect stroke-care exposure (p = 0.001). Overall, 65% achieved a high composite score; healthcare employment independently predicted a high score (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.28-3.19), whereas age and educational level were not independently associated.
conclusionsFindings support an iceberg model of stroke literacy, with surface awareness masking deeper, phase-specific gaps; education should target stroke severity misconceptions and symptom recognition, particularly in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42247171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.