ReviewCell and tissue research2026
CRISPR/Cas‑based epigenome editing for osteogenic lineage commitment.
Review in Cell and tissue research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone regeneration remains constrained by incomplete osteogenic commitment of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), underscoring the need for precise lineage control. CRISPR/Cas-based epigenome editing provides programmable access to chromatin regulators without altering the DNA sequence, and catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused to transcriptional activators, repressors, or chromatin modifiers enables locus-specific modulation of key osteogenic networks, including RUNX2, OSX, and BMP2, while suppressing inhibitory loci such as PPARG, SOST, and DKK1. Multiplex strategies further allow the concurrent activation of osteogenic genes and repression of adipogenic or Wnt antagonists, reshaping lineage allocation in vitro and in vivo. Delivery innovations-from AAV vectors and lipid nanoparticles to biomaterial scaffolds and extracellular vesicles-support local and systemic applications with increasing precision, while whole-genome chromatin profiling and high-fidelity Cas variants reduce off-target risk, and CRISPRoff/on platforms provide reversible and heritable control of transcriptional states. Proof-of-concept studies in small animals demonstrate bone repair in preclinical models, with emerging large-animal data highlighting translational potential. Remaining challenges include payload size, immunogenicity, durability of epigenetic states, GMP-grade manufacturing, and regulatory classification. Looking ahead, advances such as AI-guided gRNA libraries, mechano-responsive scaffolds, and long-term tracking of epigenetic memory may yield durable "smart" osteo-epigenetic therapies. Collectively, CRISPR/dCas9-based epigenome editing is progressing from mechanistic exploration toward clinically viable strategies for skeletal regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42247138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.