Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247113›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Long-read sequencing bridges germline and somatic variant detection: a multi-modal approach for hereditary cancer diagnostics.

Behich Koyutourk, Havva Çobanoğulları, Ömer Diker, Polat Olgun, Derya Demirtaş Esmer, Salih Müjdat Balkan, Mahmut Cerkez Ergoren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Behich KoyutourkMedical Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Near East University Hospital, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Havva ÇobanoğullarıDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Eastern Mediterranean University, 99628, Famagusta, Cyprus. havva.cobanogullari@emu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4153-7739
Ömer DikerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Near East University, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Polat OlgunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Near East University, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Derya Demirtaş EsmerDepartment of General Surgery, Near East University Hospital, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Salih Müjdat BalkanDepartment of General Surgery, Near East University Hospital, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Mahmut Cerkez ErgorenMedical Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Near East University Hospital, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective management of hereditary cancers requires the accurate detection of both germline and somatic pathogenic variants. Conventional approaches, such as liquid biopsy and short-read sequencing, are widely used but may have limitations in resolving structural variants (SVs), providing phasing information, and capturing complex genomic alterations. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing enables improved characterization of SVs and phasing, providing additional insights for germline variant analysis.

aimIn this study, we implemented a multi-modal workflow in 50 cancer patients, integrating plasma-based liquid biopsy, short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) and ONT-based germline testing.

resultsSomatic mutations were identified in 72% (36/50) of patients, primarily involving TP53, PIK3CA, EGFR, and KRAS. In parallel, germline sequencing revealed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 60% (30/50) of patients, including alterations in BRCA2, MSH2, and CHEK2. Importantly, 10% (5/50) of patients harbored clinically actionable germline variants that were not detected by liquid biopsy, whereas 22% (11/50) showed somatic-only alterations. Notably, 18% (9/50) of patients had no detectable pathogenic variants in either analysis, potentially reflecting biological factors such as low circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels or limitations in panel coverage.

conclusionThese findings highlight the complementary and non-redundant roles of somatic liquid biopsy and germline analyses. Rather than indicating diagnostic equivalence, the results show that each approach captures distinct but clinically relevant genomic information. The inclusion of ONT long-read sequencing may improve the characterization of inherited variants, particularly structural variants and phasing and may support more comprehensive risk assessment and therapeutic planning.

Indexed as

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)Germline mutationsHereditary cancer diagnosticsLong-read sequencingSomatic mutations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.