ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
Economic Impact of Timely Systemic Treatment of Psoriatic Disease in Comorbidity Risk Reduction: Literature Review and (Early) Economic Assessment.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPsoriatic disease, including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, is associated with increased risk of comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, mental health disorders, type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity), placing substantial burden on patients and health systems. We aimed to quantify the lifetime economic burden of these four comorbidities in populations with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. We subsequently estimated the potential comorbidity-related gross cost offsets from timely systemic therapy across three diverse country settings (Denmark, the USA and Vietnam).
methodsWe conducted a literature review to identify data on prevalence, comorbidity risk, treatment-associated risk reduction and cost inputs, followed by development of a static cohort-based economic model from a societal perspective. The model compared untreated/undertreated moderate-to-severe psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis; and systemic treatment scenarios (conventional systemic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [csDMARDs]; biologic DMARDs [bDMARDs]; and targeted synthetic DMARDs [tsDMARDs]) over a lifetime horizon in Denmark, the USA and Vietnam, reporting total comorbidity cost offsets across direct (healthcare) and indirect (societal) costs.
resultsSystemic treatment reduced lifetime comorbidity-related direct and societal costs across settings. In the USA, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis incurred annual direct costs of approximately 4.6 billion USD (indirect 0.6 billion USD), and untreated lifetime burden of about 153.0 billion USD. Treating all patients with bDMARDs yielded an estimated cost offset of 62.9 billion USD in the direct costs and an offset of 8.1 billion USD in the societal costs compared with a fully undertreated population. Equivalent analyses in Denmark and Vietnam reflected similar effects on comorbidity-related costs. The model shows that early systemic therapy yields substantial effect on the direct and societal costs via reduced comorbidity incidence.
conclusionsTimely and efficacious systemic treatment of psoriatic disease can significantly reduce lifetime economic burden of comorbidities across diverse healthcare settings. These findings underscore the value of early, proactive management of psoriatic disease and highlight the need for further cost-effectiveness research, including treatment uptake and real-world comorbidity prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.