Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247101›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2026

Risk of periprosthetic joint infection within 1 year following robotic-assisted versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity-score-matched cohort study.

Shuaifei Tian, Yicheng Li, Wenbo Mu, Baochao Ji, Xiaogang Zhang, Li Cao, Jin Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuaifei Tian *Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Yicheng Li *Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Wenbo MuDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Baochao JiDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Xiaogang ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Li CaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 137 South LiYuShan Road, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China.
Jin ZhaoKey Laboratory of High Incidence Disease Research in Xinjiang (Xinjiang Medical University), Ministry of Education, Ürümqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China. zhaojin@xjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Science and Technology Department 2023TSYCTD0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is increasingly being adopted for its ability to enhance bone-resection accuracy and component alignment. However, whether these technical gains influence the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains uncertain, especially in the context of prolonged operative duration. This study aimed to compare the 1-year rate of PJI following conventional total knee arthroplasty (cTKA) and RA-TKA in a propensity-score-matched cohort.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1284 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKAs at a single centre between 2021 and 2023. The patients were stratified according to surgical technique (cTKA versus RA-TKA) and subsequently matched 1:1 using propensity score analysis (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] score, CCI components and smoking), resulting in 522 pairs (1044 patients) for the final comparative analysis. Operative time and 1-year PJI were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Infections were stratified according to timing: ≤ 90 days and from 90 days to 1 year after surgery.

resultsThe 1-year rate of PJI was 0.77% (4/522) after RA-TKA and 0.96% (5/522) after cTKA (P = 1.000). All PJIs in patients who underwent RA-TKA occurred within 90 days, whereas PJIs in patients who underwent cTKA occurred in both time windows. Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not identify surgical modality as an independent predictor of PJI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-2.90; P = 0.57). The median operative time was longer in the RA-TKA group than in the cTKA group (115 (range, 90-145) versus 85 (range, 60-105) min; P < 0.001).

conclusionsRA-TKA was associated with a longer operative time, while no statistically significant difference in 1-year PJI rates was detected compared with cTKA. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of infection events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, non-randomised observational study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsOperative timePeriprosthetic joint infectionPropensity score matchingRobotic-assistedTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42247101
PMCPMC13481597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.