ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Perceived Everyday Discrimination and Ethnic Disparities in Postpartum Depression: A Longitudinal Study of Asian Canadians.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsians may face elevated risk for postpartum depression (PPD), though findings are mixed. Perceived discrimination, a known mediator of health outcomes, remains understudied in this group.
objectiveTo examine (1) the likelihood of probable PPD using culturally informed Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) cut-offs among Asian and non-Hispanic White (NHW) participants and (2) whether perceived everyday discrimination mediated the association between ethnicity and probable PPD. A secondary aim compared postpartum mental health treatment-seeking between groups.
methodsThis secondary analysis used data from the Pregnancy during the Pandemic (PdP) study, a longitudinal study that followed Canadians throughout pregnancy and the postpartum (2020-2021). Asian (n = 170) and NHW (n = 170) participants were matched on demographics (N = 340). Online surveys assessed demographics (< 35 weeks' gestation), perceived discrimination (pregnancy to 9 months postpartum), depressive symptoms, and treatment-seeking (12 months postpartum). Data were analyzed using logistic regression and path analysis. Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of alternative EPDS threshold specifications.
resultsAsian participants were more likely to meet criteria for probable PPD when using a culturally informed threshold (EPDS ≥ 9 vs. ≥ 13 for NHW). However, this difference was not observed under alternative or uniform threshold specifications. A significant indirect effect was identified, such that Asian participants reported higher perceived everyday discrimination, which was associated with increased likelihood of PPD symptoms. No group differences were observed in mental health treatment-seeking.
conclusionObserved differences in probable PPD between Asian and NHW participants were dependent on EPDS threshold specification, underscoring the sensitivity of prevalence estimates to cut-off selection. While culturally informed thresholds may improve detection, optimal EPDS cut-offs for Asian populations remain uncertain. These findings highlight the importance of culturally responsive screening approaches and the role of perceived discrimination in postpartum mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42247088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.