Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247055›Full record

ReviewNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2026

Postoperative pericardial effusion on routine echocardiography: A review of incidence, progression, and management : To dissolve or to be resolved.

Stefan van Dinter, Laurens Wollersheim, Wilson Li, Rogier Donders, Niels van Royen, Hendrik-Jan Dieker, Ad Verhagen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Introducing cardiology in numbers.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan van DinterDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Stefan.vanDinter@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2212-6347
Laurens WollersheimDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Frisius Medical Center, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Wilson LiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rogier DondersDepartment for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niels van RoyenDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hendrik-Jan DiekerDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ad VerhagenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) is a common finding after cardiac surgery, with reported incidences ranging widely from 2% to 85%. While most effusions resolve spontaneously, a subset progresses to cardiac tamponade requiring urgent intervention. This systematic review evaluated the true incidence of PPE and PPE-related reinterventions based on routine echocardiographic screening, and explored temporal evolution, symptomatology, and perioperative risk factors. A comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science through May 2025 identified 26 eligible studies including 8,495 patients. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment with the JBI checklist. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled PPE incidence of 36% (95% confidence interval (CI) 25-49%), whereas only 3% (95% CI 2-4%) required reintervention, ranging from 2% after CABG to 6% after aortic surgery. Large effusions (> 2 cm) were associated with a substantially higher likelihood of intervention (54% [14-90%]), although spontaneous resolution remained common. Preventive strategies such as posterior pericardiotomy and posterior chest tube placement significantly reduced both PPE incidence and reintervention rates. Despite these findings, interpretation is limited by substantial heterogeneity in study design, definitions, and follow-up protocols. Standardized definitions, structured echocardiographic follow-up, and prospective studies are needed to improve risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Cardiac surgical proceduresCardiac tamponadeEchocardiographyPericardial effusionPericardiocentesisPostoperative carePostoperative complicationsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42247055
PMCPMC13375986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.