Observational studyRheumatology international2026
Clinical associations and related factors of metabolic syndrome in systemic sclerosis: results from an observational multicenter study of GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale).
Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been increasingly recognised as a relevant comorbidity in systemic autoimmune diseases; however, data on its prevalence and clinical associations in systemic sclerosis (SSc) remain limited and heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MetS in a large Italian SSc cohort and to explore its clinical, functional, and vascular associations. A cross-sectional multicenter study enrolled 613 SSc patients from 11 tertiary Rheumatology centres across Italy, fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria. MetS was defined according to the International Harmonised 2009 Joint Interim Statement criteria. Clinical, laboratory, functional, and imaging data were collected. Comparisons were performed between MetS+ve and MetS-ve patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with MetS. Among 570 patients with complete data, MetS was identified in 8.4% (48/570). MetS+ve patients were older and more frequently had active disease according to the EScSG index (45.2% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.0001). They more commonly exhibited mild restrictive lung impairment, with a higher proportion showing FVC 70-79% (21.6% vs. 7%, p = 0.008), as well as moderately reduced DLCO. Cardiovascular involvement was more prevalent in MetS+ve patients, particularly left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (54.3% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.0001) and clinically diagnosed PAH (27.3% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.007). Moreover, advanced microvascular damage, reflected by a higher frequency of late nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) pattern (38.5% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.031), was more common among MetS+ve patients. In multivariable analysis adjusted \for age and sex, active disease (OR 4.79, 95% CI 2.09-10.98; p < 0.0001) and mild lung restriction (FVC 70-79%) (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.62-12.69; p = 0.004) remained independently associated with MetS. Systemic arterial hypertension was the most frequent component of MetS (77.1%). In this large Italian SSc cohort, MetS, although relatively infrequent, identified a distinct clinical phenotype characterised by increased disease activity, mild lung functional impairment, and more advanced microvascular damage. These findings support the clinical relevance of cardiometabolic comorbidity in SSc and highlight the importance of comprehensive metabolic assessment in routine care. Prospective studies are needed to clarify temporal relationships and underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.