Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42247034›Full record

ReviewHealth economics review2026

The economics of decision-making in dementia care and related life-limiting illness: a narrative review.

Ana Maksimovic, Simona Grassi, Clare Ellis-Smith, Peter May

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana MaksimovicCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK. ana.maksimovic@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8898-533X
Simona GrassiDepartment of Economics, King's Business School, King's College London, London, WC2B 4BG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-0509
Clare Ellis-SmithCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-3203
Peter MayCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-6500

Funding

Alzheimer's Society ES/Z502704/1Economic and Social Research Council ES/Z502704/1National Institute for Health and Care Research ES/Z502704/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia represents a profound healthcare and economic challenge for the 21st century. A significant proportion of associated costs originate in decision-making between people with dementia, family carers, and health and social care practitioners. Economics is a decision science that may inform such choices, but the research evidence has not been collated and synthesised. We review the decision-making literature to analyse how economic insights can be applied to decision-making in life-limiting illness and identify findings applicable to dementia.

methodsOur literature search was comprehensive and included EconLit, Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo, as well as a targeted search of relevant economic literature.

resultsWe identified 9,854 studies, of which 62 were included. We found six key economic concepts: (a) principal-agent problem, (b) uncertainty, (c) asymmetric information, (d) hyperbolic discounting, (e) the empathy gap, and (f) non-linear value of time. These findings are helpful in understanding established patterns in the evidence base, including high end-of-life costs and variable efficacy of advance care planning. DISCUSSION: These findings are used to consider the modifiability of formal, social, and household costs, and identify opportunities for future research. Dynamic communication between all decision-makers (patient, family, clinicians) is essential to overcome the identified barriers and drive improvements in dementia care. Further, we note that by integrating economic insights with lived experience, health sciences researchers get a better understanding of how decisions are made.

conclusionExamining the dynamics that shape individual-level decision-making promotes a better understanding of the drivers of costs in life-limiting illness. Economics should make wider use of this methodological approach to examine decision-making in dementia care.

Indexed as

Asymmetric informationDecision-makingDementiaPrincipal-agent problem.Uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42247034
PMCPMC13465789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.