ReviewHealth economics review2026
The economics of decision-making in dementia care and related life-limiting illness: a narrative review.
Review in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDementia represents a profound healthcare and economic challenge for the 21st century. A significant proportion of associated costs originate in decision-making between people with dementia, family carers, and health and social care practitioners. Economics is a decision science that may inform such choices, but the research evidence has not been collated and synthesised. We review the decision-making literature to analyse how economic insights can be applied to decision-making in life-limiting illness and identify findings applicable to dementia.
methodsOur literature search was comprehensive and included EconLit, Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo, as well as a targeted search of relevant economic literature.
resultsWe identified 9,854 studies, of which 62 were included. We found six key economic concepts: (a) principal-agent problem, (b) uncertainty, (c) asymmetric information, (d) hyperbolic discounting, (e) the empathy gap, and (f) non-linear value of time. These findings are helpful in understanding established patterns in the evidence base, including high end-of-life costs and variable efficacy of advance care planning. DISCUSSION: These findings are used to consider the modifiability of formal, social, and household costs, and identify opportunities for future research. Dynamic communication between all decision-makers (patient, family, clinicians) is essential to overcome the identified barriers and drive improvements in dementia care. Further, we note that by integrating economic insights with lived experience, health sciences researchers get a better understanding of how decisions are made.
conclusionExamining the dynamics that shape individual-level decision-making promotes a better understanding of the drivers of costs in life-limiting illness. Economics should make wider use of this methodological approach to examine decision-making in dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.