ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Dynamic uncertainty-level assessment framework for real-time needle tracking in CT-guided surgical environments.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate needle tracking is critical for the success of computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions, where even minor deviations may compromise procedural safety and clinical outcomes. However, existing image-guided tracking systems typically lack mechanisms to quantify and communicate the reliability of their predictions in real time, leaving clinicians to act on guidance of uncertain trustworthiness.
methodsWe propose a Dynamic Uncertainty Level Assessment Framework that provides a quantitative, real-time estimate of tracking reliability by linearly linking a predicted uncertainty score to spatial tracking error. The framework consists of three different approaches: (1) a classic method based on dynamically weighted, interpretable reliability metrics; (2) a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) that predicts uncertainty directly from multi-view image data; and (3) a hybrid CNN that adaptively optimizes metric weights while preserving interpretability. The uncertainty level is defined on a fixed scale, with
resultsExperimental validation on clinical and clinically realistic laboratory datasets of
conclusionBy enabling an intuitive uncertainty-to-error mapping, the proposed framework supports more informed intra-procedural decision-making, enhances operator trust in guidance data, and establishes a practical basis for integration into uncertainty-aware CT-guided intervention systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42247021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.