Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42246974›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2026

Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Decision Support in the Classification of Inborn Errors of Immunity.

Afrooz Arzehgar, Saeed Varasteh Yazdi, Hamid Ahanchian, Saeid Eslami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Afrooz ArzehgarDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeed Varasteh YazdiDepartment of Operations, Data and Artificial Intelligence, emlyon business school, Lyon, France.
Hamid AhanchianAllergy Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. ahanchianh@mums.ac.ir.
Saeid EslamiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 4030300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) can make a difference in patient outcomes and even cut healthcare costs. However, there are some challenges to overcome, such as clinical complexity, low awareness, and limited resources. Generative artificial intelligence has attracted considerable global attention in medical domains, particularly when integrated into clinical decision support systems (CDSS), as it has the potential to facilitate data interpretation, clinical reasoning, and the optimal use of knowledge resources. Preliminary studies have explored the potential of large language models (LLMs) in various information retrieval tasks, but a systematic evaluation of LLMs with and without retrieval mechanisms for IEI classification is still unexplored. We evaluated and compared the validity and reliability of the responses generated by four open-source and closed-source LLMs, in their baseline form and with augmented data, across 169 IEI patient records, using two input scenarios and four prompt templates. Our primary finding was that the models varied in terms of reliability and performance. The most reliable models were Gemini-1.5-Pro and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct ([Formula: see text]) and the best-performing model without data augmentation was Gemini with an F1 score of [Formula: see text]. The results also showed that retrieval strategies improved the average classification performance, increasing the F1 score from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] across all models. DeepSeek-R1, which reasoned over retrieved information through the integration of quality refinement and structured retrieval, achieved the best weighted F1 score of [Formula: see text]. The study highlights the effective use of generative AI and retrieval-augmented models as a decision support tool for IEI classification. However, incorporating retrieval systems into clinical decision-making processes requires adequate input, effective prompt engineering, and the adoption of retrieval strategies.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsReproducibility of ResultsClinical decision supportInborn errors of immunityLarge language modelsPrimary immunodeficiencyRetrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID42246974
PMCPMC13461685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.