ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Air attenuation of high power XFEL beams.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Linac Coherent Light Source II, a high-repetition-rate X-ray free-electron laser (FEL), produces high average power as well as high peak power. Air is a key radiation safety element, helping to contain the FEL beams from reaching accessible areas. At high average power, air absorption can produce a high-temperature and low-density channel along the X-ray beam path. In this case, the X-ray attenuation no longer follows the Beer-Lambert equation, exp(-μx). Air attenuation measurements were performed with X-rays focused into a gas cell at the LCLS time-resolved AMO instrument. In the measurements, several parameters were varied: the repetition rate from 102 Hz to 33.2 kHz, the pulse energy from 18 to 340 µJ and the photon energy at 316 and 346 eV. The air transmission was observed to significantly increase with X-ray power. Simulations were also performed, which included the thermal processes related to the high average power. In comparison with the measurements, the calculated air transmission is higher, confirming that the simulations are conservative and suitable for radiation safety analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.