ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
Coloniality in Simulation-Based Medical Education.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulation-based medical education (SBME) has emerged as a dominant pedagogical tool globally, yet its diffusion into low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) frequently occurs through uncritical transfer from high-income country (HIC) contexts. This viewpoint examines how coloniality, the enduring structures of power, knowledge and cultural hierarchy inherited from colonialism continue to shape SBME in LMICs. Drawing on the author's experiences as a simulationist in Sri Lanka and the United Kingdom, the paper explores how colonial assumptions manifest across three phases of simulation practice: design and planning, execution and facilitation and evaluation. In the planning stage, imported educational theories and faculty-development models often neglect local learning cultures and social hierarchies, resulting in pedagogical dissonance. In execution, simulation activities are frequently delivered in colonial languages and rely on equipment designed for Western physiologies, producing artificial learning encounters and limiting psychological safety. Evaluation processes, meanwhile, depend on HIC-derived metrics and standards that marginalise Indigenous perspectives and reinforce epistemic dependency. These practices collectively reproduce inequities that privilege Western frameworks while silencing local innovation and contextual adaptation. Decolonising SBME therefore requires deliberate awareness, reflection and re-design-through multilingual instruction, co-creation of contextually relevant scenarios and development of locally led faculty and research ecosystems. By reframing simulation not as a technology to be imported but as a relational, culturally situated educational practice, educators can create more authentic and equitable learning environments. This article calls on simulationists, educators and policymakers in both HICs and LMICs to recognise colonial legacies in SBME and to pursue inclusive, locally grounded approaches that enhance patient safety and learning outcomes without perpetuating dependency. Confronting coloniality within simulation is thus a necessary step towards the broader decolonisation of global medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.