ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Molecular-Structural MRI Mismatch for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Pediatric Neuroblastoma.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Imaging Tools for Improved Risk Stratification of Pediatric Neuroblastoma.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To establish molecular-structural mismatch indexes and explore their potential for the preoperative risk stratification of individuals with pediatric neuroblastoma. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 102 pediatric individuals with suspected neuroblastoma were initially enrolled and underwent structural MRI and amide proton transfer (APT) MRI from April 2019 to November 2023. A four-pool Lorentzian fitting model was employed to minimize motion artifacts and extract the APT signal from confounding factors, generating APT maps and APT-weighted (APTw) images. Novel molecular-structural mismatch images were then synthesized using APT maps, APTw images, and conventional structural MRI. The mean tumor region of interest values on APT, APTw, and mismatch images were compared across risk groups using Wilcoxon rank sum tests; receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the performance of these values in risk stratification, and the DeLong test was used to evaluate differences in the area under the curve (AUC). Results The final analysis included 71 participants (mean ± SD age at examination, 45.8 months ± 31.6; 52 male individuals), comprising 42 participants at high risk and 29 at non-high risk. The mean tumor region of interest values on APT, APTw, and mismatch images were greater in those at high risk than those not at high risk (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.