Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42246648›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuropsychology2026

Differential aspects of familiar people recognition disorders in right and left variants of semantic dementia: A critical review.

Guido Gainotti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guido GainottiInstitute of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-6612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present review will consist of discussing the different forms of familiar people recognition disorders observed in the right and left variants of semantic dementia. The review will start with a summary of the main cognitive models of familiar people recognition and of the neuroanatomical correlates of the processing stages proposed by these models. In this section, the role played by 'familiarity feelings' and by the properly 'semantic' aspects of familiar people recognition in the recognition of familiar people will be taken separately into account. The different roles played by the right and left anterior temporal lobes in each of these components of the system will also be stressed. In the second part of the review, I will discuss results obtained by patients with right and left variants of semantic dementia on tasks assessing 'familiarity feelings' and the distinction between general and social knowledge, reaching the following conclusions: (a) recognition disorders shown by patients with a right variant of semantic dementia are due to more to the disruption of pre-semantic mechanisms allowing the automatic generation of familiarity feelings than to properly semantic defects; (b) the right anterior temporal lobe (ATL) supports more the concrete than the abstract components of 'social knowledge'; (c) the right ATL can store only information that can be represented in a concrete pictorial format whereas the left ATL mainly stores information that can be represented only through abstract linguistic propositions (240).

Indexed as

Frontotemporal Lobar DegenerationFunctional LateralityRecognition, PsychologyHumansNeuropsychological TestsTemporal Lobefamiliarity feelings, verbal and non‐verbal semantic disordersfamiliar people recognition disordersright and left variants of semantic dementiaright anterior temporal lobes

Identifiers

PMID42246648
PMCPMC13552255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.