ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Machine-learning prediction of affinity and epistasis in the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor-chymotrypsin complex.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine-learning prediction of affinity and epistasis in the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor-chymotrypsin complex.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are shaped by evolutionary pressures that fine-tune binding affinities and drive the epistatic relationships that support functional outcomes. Here, we used the complex of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) and chymotrypsin as a model system to study how mutations at one or two positions affect binding affinity and epistasis. To predict the binding affinity landscape of the BPTI-chymotrypsin complex, we combined deep sequencing data, obtained from a saturation scanning mutagenesis BPTI library, with a machine-learning (ML) model. Using this ML model, which was trained on a subset of experimental binding data, we predicted the binding affinities and epistatic interactions across thousands of single and double BPTI mutants, including those not observed in the library. Our predictive approach completed missing data points and enabled us to reveal global trends in affinity changes and mutation couplings within specific binding interface positions. Our analysis revealed that different mutations in the same position may have different effects on affinity, with most double mutations leading to increased epistasis, particularly at hotspot positions, thereby indicating a cooperative binding effect. In most cases, affinity and epistasis were inversely correlated, with affinity enhancement of double-mutant variants being associated with negative epistasis. Our approach can be readily generalized to predict mutation effects in larger combinatorial libraries and in proteins for which structural information is lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.