ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2026
Functional hydrogels in cardiovascular therapy: Design, applications and clinical challenges (Review).
Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and conventional treatments (such as pharmacotherapy, stents and bypass surgery) have limited capacity to repair damaged cardiovascular tissue. Hydrogels, as biocompatible three‑dimensional network materials, demonstrate potential for the treatment of CVD. The present review summarizes functional hydrogels for CVD treatment, including their preparation, applications, current challenges and future perspectives. Hydrogel materials comprise natural polymers, synthetic polymers and composite systems, each with distinct advantages and limitations: Natural polymers offer good biocompatibility but exhibit poor mechanical strength; synthetic polymers provide tunable properties but lack inherent bioactivity; composites combine the advantages of both but are more complex to manufacture. Stimuli‑responsive hydrogels respond to environmental cues and enable on‑demand therapeutic delivery. In terms of clinical applications, hydrogels have potential for post‑infarction myocardial repair, vascular regeneration, heart valve repair and regeneration and heart failure management. They serve as scaffolds, as well as cell and drug delivery carriers. Nevertheless, hydrogels face challenges in clinical translation, including safety, long‑term biocompatibility, mechanical and electrical compatibility with host tissue, thrombogenicity, large‑scale manufacturing, integration with standard care and regulatory approval. In the future, hydrogel systems are may evolve toward stimuli‑responsive, self‑regulating, adaptive and personalized designs, integrate with emerging therapeutic strategies (such as gene therapy, cell therapy, and RNA‑based therapeutics) and be used in conjunction with existing medical devices (stents, vascular grafts, pacemakers, and ventricular assist devices), thereby becoming an important platform for cardiovascular regenerative therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.