Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42246070›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2026

Informing quarantine policy for measles control in primary school and daycare settings: insights from a simulation study, Flanders, Belgium.

Cécile Kremer, Naïma Hammami, Laura Cornelissen, Heidi Theeten, Toon Braeye, Andrea Torneri, Steven Abrams, Niel Hens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cécile KremerData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Naïma HammamiAgency for Care and Health, Infection Prevention and Control, Flemish Community, Ghent, Belgium.
Laura CornelissenDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Heidi TheetenAgency for Care and Health, Infection Prevention and Control, Flemish Community, Ghent, Belgium.
Toon BraeyeData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Andrea TorneriData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Steven AbramsData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Niel HensData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDWith a notification rate of 44.9 per million population in 2024, Belgium was among the countries with the highest measles rate of the European Union/European Economic Area countries. Although the coverage of the first dose of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination in Flanders was 96% in 2020, two-dose coverage was below 95%. To minimise the risk of sustained measles transmission in vulnerable settings, such as primary schools with low vaccination coverage or daycares, it is important to quarantine susceptible contacts of a measles case.AIMWe aimed to identify policies that balance measles outbreak control with societal as well as educational impact of quarantining children.METHODSUsing a simulation model, we evaluated the impact of different quarantine strategies for measles in primary school and daycare settings in Flanders, Belgium.RESULTSWe found that shortening the quarantine period from 21 to 18 days only moderately (e.g. 16-37% in primary school) increased the risk of a subsequent infection wave, and the final proportion of later-generation cases remained at most 3.2% of the school or daycare. In settings with a low vaccination coverage (e.g. 20%), multiple independent introductions or a low diagnosis rate (e.g. only half of symptomatic children going to a doctor), the addition of post-exposure vaccination can further reduce transmission risk.CONCLUSIONWe found that quarantine duration could be shorter than the presumed maximal incubation period of 21 days, without substantially increasing the risk of onward transmission. As such, acceptability and compliance with mandated quarantine periods might also increase.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersDisease OutbreaksMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineQuarantineSchoolsBelgiumChildChild, PreschoolComputer SimulationHealth PolicyHumansVaccinationVaccination CoverageMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccinemeaslespost-exposure vaccinationpublic healthquarantinesimulation model

Identifiers

PMID42246070
PMCPMC13241790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.