SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Sexsomnia: an umbrella review of clinical, neurophysiological and diagnostic evidence.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sexsomnia is a NREM parasomnia involving involuntary sleep-related sexual behaviors that has attracted increasing clinical and forensic attention. However, the existing literature remains fragmented and largely dominated by case reports and small clinical series. Objective: This umbrella review aims to synthesize review-level evidence by integrating clinical and neurophysiological insights while identifying critical gaps in diagnosis and management. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, major databases were systematically searched up to January 2025. Systematic, narrative, and scoping reviews were included and assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: Nine reviews were analyzed. Sexsomnia is consistently described as a disorder of arousal emerging from N2/N3 sleep, characterized by sexual automatisms and subsequent amnesia. Neurophysiological findings support a model of state dissociation between motor activation and incomplete cortical awakening. Key triggers include sleep deprivation, alcohol consumption, and obstructive sleep apnea. Diagnostic challenges persist, particularly in differentiating involuntary behaviors from deliberate acts. Conclusion: Despite recognition as a clinical entity, sexsomnia lacks standardized diagnostic criteria and robust empirical evidence. Future research should focus on establishing consensus diagnostic frameworks and validating objective assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.