ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Detection of residual consciousness using EEG indicators related to rectal perception: protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07208942 (Diagnosis Value of Interoceptive EEG Indicators by Rectal Stimulation in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnosis Value of Interoceptive EEG Indicators by Rectal Stimulation in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate diagnosis of disorders of consciousness (DoC), including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), remains a long-standing and unresolved challenge in clinical practice. Current diagnostic frameworks rely predominantly on behavioral responsiveness, with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) serving as the clinical gold standard. However, behavior-based evaluation is intrinsically vulnerable to examiner subjectivity and cognitive-motor dissociation, contributing to misdiagnosis rates of up to 40%. From a theoretical perspective, consciousness comprises both external awareness and self-awareness, yet existing DoC assessments focus almost exclusively on external sensory processing, leaving self-awareness substantially underassessed. This imbalance highlights a critical gap that motivates for complementary assessment approaches targeting underexplored dimensions of consciousness. Methods and analysis: This study protocol aims to develop an EEG-based paradigm and evaluate its feasibility for assessing gut-related interoceptive processing in patients with DoC, using controlled, non-invasive rectal balloon distension. Standardized stimulation procedures, synchronized EEG acquisition, and predefined analytical pipelines will be implemented to characterize the temporal and spatial features interoceptive event-related potentials. Results: Electrophysiological and statistical analyses will be conducted to assess the feasibility, signal characteristics, and response profiles of gut-related interoceptive EEG activity across diagnostic categories. Exploratory analyses will further examine associations between interoceptive EEG markers and clinical behavioral measures. Discussion: By systematically investigating an under assessed dimension of consciousness, this study protocol aims to establish the feasibility and signal-level characteristics of gut-related interoceptive EEG responses in patients with disorders of consciousness. By providing methodological and exploratory evidence at the group level, the findings are intended to inform the design of future hypothesis-driven and validation studies, and to support the longer-term development of complementary assessment approaches that extend beyond behavior-based evaluation, with potential relevance for clinical research and public health-oriented diagnostic strategies. Clinical trial registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT07208942].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.