ReviewACS materials letters2026
Reprogramming Porosity: The Synthetic Evolution of Pore Engineering in Metal-Organic Frameworks.
Review in ACS materials letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) provide an exceptional platform for pore engineering due to their modularity, crystallinity, and diverse synthetic routes. Traditionally, porosity was controlled by linker length and metal node selection, but recent advances enable active reprogramming of pore environments through synthetic and postsynthetic modifications. This review highlights strategies to tune pore size, geometry, surface chemistry, and flexibility, including linker exchange and insertion, defect engineering, cluster metalation, and covalent or coordinative postsynthetic modifications. It also discusses the growth of functional species within existing pores. Emphasis is placed on mechanistic design rules that define how far such transformations can proceed while preserving long-range order. By unifying these approaches under synthetic pore reprogramming, the review outlines a framework for systematically modifying MOFs beyond their original structures. This enables access to properties and functions unattainable in pristine materials and lays the foundation for designing programmable porous materials with tailored performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.