ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Automated classification of conversation valence and arousal using autonomic nervous system responses.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The quality of dyadic cooperation or conversation can be predicted from the interacting individuals' physiological responses, and several studies have combined physiological responses with machine learning algorithms to classify conversation states. However, most of these studies have focused on either a single physiological response or two-class classification. In this study, we used multiple autonomic nervous system responses and pattern recognition algorithms to automatically classify four dyadic conversation scenarios corresponding to four quadrants of the arousal-valence space. Methods: Heart rate, electrodermal activity, respiration, and peripheral skin temperature were measured from Results: The highest 4-class classification accuracy achieved using physiological responses was 51.5%. Conversely, human raters achieved an accuracy of 69.6% based on manual review of audio/video, and an accuracy of 79.5% was achieved using participants' self-report questionnaire responses. Discussion: While the study is considered exploratory since many algorithms were tested, we conclude that dyadic autonomic nervous system responses can be used to classify conversation valence and arousal, but such physiological responses are not as accurate as human observers or self-report questionnaires. We finally propose potential additional analyses as well as three directions for future experiments: combining physiological responses with other data types, scenarios where participants have different perceptions of the interaction, and clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.