ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Caregivers' Preference for Antipsychotic Medication for Youth Less Than 18 Years-Old: A Discrete Choice Experiment Pilot.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antipsychotics are often prescribed for youth with complex mental health conditions but carry risks of metabolic adverse effects. Caregivers play a key role in weighing the potential benefit of treating the underlying mental health condition with the potential risk of side effects. Objective: To evaluate caregivers' preferences for the benefits and risks of antipsychotic medication for their child and to assess how these preferences relate to treatment acceptability. Methods: We recruited 26 caregivers of youth <18 years-old across the greater Baltimore region to pilot test a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE included nine choice tasks, each with three profiles and six attributes per profile, with three for the risks (weight gain, diabetes, cholesterol) and three for the benefits (self-harm episodes, aggressive behavior, hospitalizations) of antipsychotics. For each choice task, participants first selected the most acceptable profile; second, indicated if they would use their chosen profile. Conditional logit models estimated part-worth utilities. We calculated the relative attribute importance and assessed trade-offs between attributes. Summing the part-worth utilities for attributes within each DCE profile, we identified profiles with the largest utility and assessed the acceptance of the profile chosen. Results: Participants were, on average, 44 years-old; 76% were biological mothers. Nearly half of the youth (46%) had prior psychiatric hospitalization, 70% had aggression towards property, and 90% had aggression towards others. Reduction in hospitalizations (34%), days with aggressive behavior (22%), and self-harm episodes (15%) achieved greater relative importance than diabetes risk (14%), weight gain (11%), and high cholesterol (4%). Participants accepted 2.21 hospitalizations per year to reduce diabetes risk from four-fold to two-fold. Sixty-five percent of the profiles selected were those participants would use. Conclusion: Prioritizing outcomes over the antipsychotic metabolic adverse effects underscores the importance of eliciting caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.