ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2026
Evaluation of Implant Removal Difficulty in Distal Femur Fractures: A Comparison between Stainless Steel and Titanium Locking Compression Plate.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Objectives: Titanium plates may offer advantages in fracture healing, yet concerns remain regarding hardware removal due to risks such as screw stripping and cold welding. Whether titanium removal is more difficult than stainless steel remains uncertain. This study compared the ease of implant removal, focusing on distal femur fractures treated with titanium versus stainless-steel plates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with distal femur fractures who underwent implant removal after fixation with either stainless-steel or titanium plates. The primary outcome was difficulty of removal, including cold welding, screw stripping, hardware breakage, and use of advanced tools (screw removal set, trephine, burr). The secondary outcome was operative duration. Results: Seventy-two patients were included: 31 stainless steel and 41 titanium. Mean in-vivo implant time was 421 ± 498 days for stainless steel and 360 ± 409 days for titanium (P = 0.57). Difficulties with removal occurred in 13% of stainless-steel cases and 12% of titanium cases (P = 0.92). Screw removal sets were required in 9.7% and 9.8% of patients, respectively (P = 0.99). Advanced extraction tools were used in 3 patients per group (P = 0.72). Cold-welded or stripped screws occurred in 2 patients in each group (P = 0.77). Mean operative time was 155 ± 80 minutes for stainless steel versus 118 ± 67 minutes for titanium (P = 0.06). Conclusion: In distal femur fractures, titanium plate removal is not associated with increased technical difficulty compared with stainless steel implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.