ReviewRSC advances2026
Continuous sample drop flow microextraction: a versatile and green microextraction tool in analytical chemistry.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous sample drop-flow microextraction (CSDF-ME) has become a powerful and versatile liquid-phase microextraction methodology that overcomes several of the analytical and environmental shortcomings of traditional sample preparation procedures. In CSDF-ME, the aqueous sample is continuously added to a small, stagnant volume of extraction solvent, resulting in large renewed interfacial areas that favor efficient mass transfer, high enrichment factors, and good reproducibility, using only microliter volumes of solvent. Despite its growing importance and increasing range of applications, an independent and comprehensive review dedicated exclusively to CSDF-ME is still lacking; therefore, a critical and focused overview of this technique is highly necessary. This review provides a comprehensive overview of CSDF-ME, covering its working principles, method development and optimization strategies, analytical performance and validation, as well as its applications in environmental, food, biological, and pharmaceutical analyses. Special focus is given to recent advances in green extraction methods, including the use of fatty acids and deep eutectic solvents. The existing constraints, such as automation and solid-sample processing, are addressed, and the prospects for further evolution and broader use of CSDF-ME are outlined. In general, CSDF-ME has proven to be an effective and environmentally friendly sample preparation method in modern analytical chemistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.