Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245974›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

A prospective double-blinded study evaluating threshold doses of dietary allergens that trigger adverse food reactions in dogs, and time to flare after exposure.

Laura Udraite Vovk, Laura Widorn, Georg Lehner, Ralf S Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Udraite VovkCenter for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Laura WidornCenter for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Georg LehnerKleintierpraxis Lehner, Fachpraxis für Dermatologie, Buch, Germany.
Ralf S MuellerCenter for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse food reactions (AFR) are a common cause of chronic pruritus in dogs and often present as atopic dermatitis. However, the threshold dose of dietary protein required to trigger clinical signs of AFR, as well as the time to onset of those signs, remain poorly defined. Methods: This prospective, double-blinded study aimed to determine the approximate dose of food protein required to elicit clinical signs in dogs with previously confirmed AFRs and to assess the time to flare (TTF) following a single dietary protein provocation. Eleven dogs with confirmed AFR underwent 71 randomized oral food challenges (OFC) with seven individual protein sources in escalating doses for each protein over 7 days. Results: Clinical signs were observed in 35 challenges, most commonly between days 2 and 6, with a mean TTF of 4.1 days (range: 1-7 days). Reactions were mostly triggered by 20-30 g of food protein, with a mean dose of 21 g (range: 1-30 g). When adjusted for body weight, this corresponded to a median eliciting dose of approximately 0.86 g/kg (range: 0.06-2.5 g/kg). Discussion: While most dogs reacted to moderate-to-high protein exposure after repeated OFC, the variability in individual responses in both threshold dose and TTF highlights the need for further studies to refine diagnostic protocols and define clinically relevant threshold doses.

Indexed as

adverse food reactionscanine atopic dermatitisdietary proteinselimination diet trialoral food challengethreshold dosetime to flare

Identifiers

PMID42245974
PMCPMC13229624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.