Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245935›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Summary of the best evidence for adult nasal high-flow oxygen therapy nebulization management.

Sha Xie, Fengmei Li, Zhi Zeng, Dan Wen, Xiaoli Du

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sha Xie *Intensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Fengmei Li *Intensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Zhi Zeng *Intensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Dan WenIntensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoli DuIntensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically search, assess, and compile the best evidence on the management of nebulization in adult patients on nasal high-flow oxygen therapy, thereby providing a reference for evidence-based nursing practice. Methods: This evidence summary was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for evidence synthesis and was guided by the '6S' evidence resource model. A systematic search was performed in multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Database, and the China Biomedical Literature Database, for publications up to September 2024. The study selection process was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Three researchers independently performed the literature appraisal, evidence extraction, and grading of recommendations. Results: In total, 839 records were retrieved, and 13 articles were finally included, comprising 1 clinical decision, 2 guidelines, 1 team standard, 7 expert consensuses, and 2 evidence summaries. Quality appraisal using AGREE II showed all three guidelines/standards scored above 60% across all domains. Among the seven expert consensuses, most items were rated positively. From the included literature, 26 best evidence statements were extracted and summarized across seven key areas: preparation for nebulization, medication management, selection and setup of nebulization devices, proper usage, monitoring and nursing, management of nebulization in respiratory infectious diseases, and patient education. The evidence levels ranged from Level 1 to Level 5, and the grades of recommendation included both A (strong) and B (weak). Conclusion: The research has compiled and consolidated the optimal evidence for managing nebulization in adult patients receiving nasal high-flow oxygen therapy. This summary provides a structured compilation of current best practices, primarily derived from guidelines and expert consensus, which can serve as a practical reference to guide the nebulization process for these patients.

Indexed as

adultsevidence summaryinhalationnasal high-flow oxygen therapynebulization

Identifiers

PMID42245935
PMCPMC13229881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.